Order Paper and Notice Paper
The Order Paper and Notice Paper is a document that guides the deliberations of the Senate and lists items of business currently before it. These items are listed in several different categories and in a priority according to an arrangement adopted by the Senate as stipulated in the rules. The majority of these items constitute the Orders of the Day which are called following Routine Proceedings. These items are themselves divided into two principal categories - government business and other business. Within each of these two categories are items for bills, motions, inquiries and reports of committees.
The Notice Paper contains the text of motions and inquiries not yet called for debate.
The Order Paper and Notice Paper is prepared every day in advance of the actual sitting.
Order of Business
(The following is an outline of a typical sitting day in the Senate. Variations are possible subject to the Rules and to the decisions of the Senate.)
Senators' Statements (15 minutes)
ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS (30 minutes)
1. Tabling of Documents
2. Presenting or Tabling Reports from Committees
3. Government Notices of Motions
4. Government Notices of Inquiries
5. Introduction and First Reading of Government Bills
6. Introduction and First Reading of Senate Public Bills
7. First Reading of Commons Public Bills
8. Reading of Petitions for Private Bills
9. Introduction and First Reading of Private Bills
10. Tabling of Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations
11. Notices of Motions
12. Notices of Inquiries
13. Tabling of Petitions
Question Period (30 minutes)
Delayed Answers
ORDERS OF THE DAY
Government Business
• Bills — Messages from the House of Commons
• Bills — Third Reading
• Bills — Reports of Committees
• Bills — Second Reading
• Reports of Committees — Other
• Motions
• Inquiries
• Other
Other Business
• Bills — Messages from the House of Commons
• Senate Public Bills — Third Reading
• Commons Public Bills — Third Reading
• Private Bills — Third Reading
• Senate Public Bills — Reports of Committees
• Commons Public Bills — Reports of Committees
• Private Bills — Reports of Committees
• Senate Public Bills — Second Reading
• Commons Public Bills — Second Reading
• Private Bills — Second Reading
• Reports of Committees — Other
• Motions
• Inquiries
• Other
NOTICE PAPER
• Notices of Motions
• Notices of Inquiries
Orders Of The Day
Government Business
Bills – Messages from the House of Commons
Nil
Bills – Third Reading
No. 1.
February 8, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Wetston, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cormier, for the third reading of Bill C-25, An Act to amend the Canada Business Corporations Act, the Canada Cooperatives Act, the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act, and the Competition Act, as amended.
Bills – Reports of Committees
Nil
Bills – Second Reading
No. 1.
January 30, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Wetston, for the second reading of Bill C-24, An Act to amend the Salaries Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Financial Administration Act.
No. 2.
November 30, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Dean, seconded by the Honourable Senator Forest, for the second reading of Bill C-45, An Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other Acts.
No. 3.
March 1, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Mercer, seconded by the Honourable Senator Day, for the second reading of Bill C-50, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (political financing).
No. 4.
February 15, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Sinclair, seconded by the Honourable Senator Mitchell, for the second reading of Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act.
No. 5.
February 6, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ringuette, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cools, for the second reading of Bill C-58, An Act to amend the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.
No. 6.
February 8, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Cormier, seconded by the Honourable Senator Petitclerc, for the second reading of Bill C-66, An Act to establish a procedure for expunging certain historically unjust convictions and to make related amendments to other Acts.
Reports of Committees – Other
Nil
Motions
No. 1.
December 8, 2015—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Jaffer, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cordy:
That the following Address be presented to His Excellency the Governor General of Canada:
To His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, Chancellor and Principal Companion of the Order of Canada, Chancellor and Commander of the Order of Military Merit, Chancellor and Commander of the Order of Merit of the Police Forces, Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada.
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY:
We, Her Majesty’s most loyal and dutiful subjects, the Senate of Canada in Parliament assembled, beg leave to offer our humble thanks to Your Excellency for the gracious Speech which Your Excellency has addressed to both Houses of Parliament.
Inquiries
No. 3.
By the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.:
February 28, 2018—That he will call the attention of the Senate to the budget entitled Equality + Growth: A Strong Middle Class, tabled in the House of Commons on February 27, 2018, by the Minister of Finance, the Honourable Bill Morneau, P.C., M.P., and in the Senate on February 28, 2018.
Other
Nil
Other Business
Rule 4-15(2) states:
Except as otherwise ordered by the Senate, any item of Other Business on the Order Paper and any motion or inquiry on the Notice Paper that have not been proceeded with during 15 sitting days shall be dropped from the Order Paper and Notice Paper.
Consequently, the number appearing in parentheses indicates the number of sittings since the item was last proceeded with.
Bills – Messages from the House of Commons
Nil
Senate Public Bills – Third Reading
No. 1. (three)
March 28, 2017—Third reading of Bill S-213, An Act to amend the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Parliament of Canada Act (Speakership of the Senate).—(Honourable Senator Mercer)
No. 2.
March 1, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Stewart Olsen, seconded by the Honourable Senator White, for the third reading of Bill S-214, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (cruelty-free cosmetics), as amended.—(Honourable Senator Dyck)
No. 3. (one)
June 13, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Tkachuk, seconded by the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C., for the third reading of Bill S-219, An Act to deter Iran-sponsored terrorism, incitement to hatred, and human rights violations.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 4. (three)
February 15, 2018—Third reading of Bill S-238, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act (importation of shark fins), as amended.—(Honourable Senator Gold)
Commons Public Bills – Third Reading
Nil
Private Bills – Third Reading
Nil
Senate Public Bills – Reports of Committees
No. 1. (nine)
November 28, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Manning, seconded by the Honourable Senator Housakos, for the adoption of the seventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans (Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins), with amendments), presented in the Senate on October 31, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 2. (three)
February 1, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., for the adoption of the twenty-second report of the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology (Bill S-234, An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (Parliamentary Artist Laureate), with amendments), presented in the Senate on December 14, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 3. (four)
February 13, 2018—Consideration of the twentieth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce (Bill S-237, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (criminal interest rate), with amendments), presented in the Senate on February 13, 2018.—(Honourable Senator Black (Alberta))
Commons Public Bills – Reports of Committees
Nil
Private Bills – Reports of Committees
Nil
Senate Public Bills – Second Reading
No. 1. (fourteen)
February 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Hervieux-Payette, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., for the second reading of Bill S-206, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence).—(Honourable Senator Andreychuk)
No. 2. (eleven)
March 24, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Patterson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Enverga, for the second reading of Bill S-221, An Act to amend the Constitution Act, 1867 (Property qualifications of Senators).—(Honourable Senator Wells)
No. 3. (six)
June 1, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Frum, seconded by the Honourable Senator Housakos, for the second reading of Bill S-239, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (eliminating foreign funding).—(Honourable Senator Dupuis)
No. 4.
December 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ataullahjan, seconded by the Honourable Senator Andreychuk, for the second reading of Bill S-240, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (trafficking in human organs).—(Honourable Senator Richards)
No. 5. (seven)
November 1, 2017—Second reading of Bill S-242, An Act to amend the Competition Act (misrepresentations to public).—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 6. (four)
November 28, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Downe, seconded by the Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C., for the second reading of Bill S-243, An Act to amend the Canada Revenue Agency Act (reporting on unpaid income tax).—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 7. (four)
February 13, 2018—Second reading of Bill S-244, An Act respecting Kindness Week.—(Honourable Senator Munson)
No. 8. (three)
February 15, 2018—Second reading of Bill S-245, An Act to declare the Trans Mountain Pipeline Project and related works to be for the general advantage of Canada.—(Honourable Senator Black (Alberta))
No. 9.
March 1, 2018—Second reading of Bill S-246, An Act to amend the Borrowing Authority Act.—(Honourable Senator Day)
Commons Public Bills – Second Reading
No. 1. (one)
October 26, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator White, seconded by the Honourable Senator Enverga, for the second reading of Bill C-211, An Act respecting a federal framework on post-traumatic stress disorder.—(Honourable Senator McPhedran)
No. 2.
December 6, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Mégie, seconded by the Honourable Senator Dupuis, for the second reading of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy.—(Honourable Senator Marshall)
No. 3. (one)
October 24, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Dawson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., for the second reading of Bill C-309, An Act to establish Gender Equality Week.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 4. (eleven)
June 6, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Andreychuk, seconded by the Honourable Senator Seidman, for the second reading of Bill C-337, An Act to amend the Judges Act and the Criminal Code (sexual assault).—(Honourable Senator Cools)
Private Bills – Second Reading
Nil
Reports of Committees – Other
No. 1. (four)
November 15, 2016—Resuming debate on the consideration of the first report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on October 4, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Omidvar)
No. 5. (twelve)
November 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Tannas, seconded by the Honourable Senator Wells, for the adoption of the sixth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Speakership), presented in the Senate on October 5, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Mercer)
No. 6. (six)
November 22, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Massicotte, seconded by the Honourable Senator Moore for the adoption of the seventh report (interim), as amended, of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Regional interest), presented in the Senate on October 18, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Wells)
No. 7. (nine)
February 28, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Frum, seconded by the Honourable Senator Beyak for the adoption of the ninth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Question Period), presented in the Senate on October 25, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Omidvar)
No. 8. (eleven)
December 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Cordy for the adoption of the tenth report (interim), as amended, of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Nature), presented in the Senate on October 26, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Housakos)
No. 10. (one)
March 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator MacDonald, seconded by the Honourable Senator Patterson:
That the sixth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications, entitled Pipelines for Oil: Protecting our Economy, Respecting our Environment, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on December 7, 2016 be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of Natural Resources being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report, in consultation with the Ministers of Transport and Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard.—(Honourable Senator Day)
No. 15. (fourteen)
March 28, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Fraser, seconded by the Honourable Senator Hubley for the adoption of the fourth report (interim) of the Standing Committee on Rules, Procedures and the Rights of Parliament, entitled Sessional Order, presented in the Senate on March 7, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Smith)
No. 29. (eleven)
May 9, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Lang, seconded by the Honourable Senator Smith, for the adoption of the tenth report (interim) of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, entitled Military underfunded: The walk must match the talk, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on April 13, 2017.
And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Day:
That the tenth report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence be not now adopted, but that it be amended by deleting the second recommendation.—(Honourable Senator Dagenais)
No. 33. (eleven)
May 11, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Lang, seconded by the Honourable Senator Martin:
That the eleventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence, entitled Reinvesting in the Canadian Armed Forces: A plan for the future, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on May 8, 2017, be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of National Defence being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report.
And on the motion of the Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Day:
That the eleventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence be not now adopted, but that it be referred back to the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence for consideration, particularly in light of the document entitled Strong, Secure, Engaged: Canada’s Defence Policy, tabled in the Senate on June 7, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Dagenais)
No. 50. (eight)
November 1, 2017—Resuming debate on the consideration of the tenth report (interim) of the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources, entitled Decarbonizing Transportation in Canada, tabled in the Senate on June 22, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Neufeld)
No. 51. (eight)
February 1, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Mockler, seconded by the Honourable Senator Martin:
That the nineteenth report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance entitled Getting Ready: For a new generation of active seniors, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on June 27, 2017, be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of Families, Children and Social Development being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report, in consultation with the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development, and Labour, and the Minister of Health.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)
No. 52. (eight)
February 1, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Mockler, seconded by the Honourable Senator Raine:
That the twentieth report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance entitled Smarter Planning, Smarter Spending: Ensuring Transparency, Accountability and Predictability in Federal Infrastructure Programs, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on July 6, 2017 be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of Infrastructure and Communities being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 64. (seven)
December 11, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Massicotte, seconded by the Honourable Senator Tannas for the adoption of the twenty-first report (interim) of the Standing Committee on Internal Economy, Budgets and Administration, entitled Audit and Oversight, presented in the Senate on November 28, 2017.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 66. (four)
February 13, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Mockler, seconded by the Honourable Senator Tkachuk:
That the twenty-fourth report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance, entitled Fair, Simple and Competitive Taxation: The way forward for Canada, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on December 13, 2017, be adopted and that, pursuant to rule 12-24(1), the Senate request a complete and detailed response from the government, with the Minister of Finance being identified as minister responsible for responding to the report.—(Honourable Senator Pratte)
Motions
No. 31. (six)
February 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, seconded by the Honourable Senator Enverga:
That the Senate — in order to ensure transparency in the awarding of public funds and foster efficiency in infrastructure projects in the larger context of economic diversification and movement toward a greener economy, all while avoiding undue intervention in the federal-provincial division of powers — encourage the government to make provision in the budget for the creation of the Canadian Infrastructure Oversight and Best Practices Council, made up of experts in infrastructure projects from the provinces and territories, whose principal roles would be to:
1.collect information on federally funded infrastructure projects;
2. study the costs and benefits of federally funded infrastructure projects;
3. identify procurements best practices and of risk sharing;
4. promote these best practices among governments; and
5. promote project managers skills development; and
That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House with the above.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 73. (nine)
March 24, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Patterson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Runciman:
Whereas the Senate provides representation for groups that are often underrepresented in Parliament, such as Aboriginal peoples, visible minorities and women;
Whereas paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867 requires that, in order to be qualified for appointment to and to maintain a place in the Senate, a person must own land with a net worth of at least four thousand dollars in the province for which he or she is appointed;
Whereas a person’s personal circumstances or the availability of real property in a particular location may prevent him or her from owning the required property;
Whereas appointment to the Senate should not be restricted to those who own real property of a minimum net worth;
Whereas the existing real property qualification is inconsistent with the democratic values of modern Canadian society and is no longer an appropriate or relevant measure of the fitness of a person to serve in the Senate;
Whereas, in the case of Quebec, each of the twenty-four Senators representing the province must be appointed for and must have either their real property qualification in or be resident of a specified Electoral Division;
Whereas an amendment to the Constitution of Canada in relation to any provision that applies to one or more, but not all, provinces may be made by proclamation issued by the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada only where so authorized by resolutions of the Senate and House of Commons and of the legislative assembly of each province to which the amendment applies;
Whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has determined that a full repeal of paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867, respecting the real property qualification of Senators, would require a resolution of the Quebec National Assembly pursuant to section 43 of the Constitution Act, 1982;
Now, therefore, the Senate resolves that an amendment to the Constitution of Canada be authorized to be made by proclamation issued by His Excellency the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada in accordance with the Schedule hereto.
SCHEDULE
AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA
1.(1) Paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is repealed.
(2) Section 23 of the Act is amended by replacing the semi-colon at the end of paragraph (5) with a period and by repealing paragraph (6).
2.The Declaration of Qualification set out in The Fifth Schedule to the Act is replaced by the following:
I, A.B., do declare and testify that I am by law duly qualified to be appointed a member of the Senate of Canada.
3. This Amendment may be cited as the Constitution Amendment, [year of proclamation] (Real property qualification of Senators).—(Honourable Senator Pratte)
No. 89. (thirteen)
May 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, seconded by the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.:
That, in order to ensure that legislative reports of Senate committees follow a transparent, comprehensible and non-partisan methodology, the Rules of the Senate be amended by replacing rule 12-23(1) by the following:
“Obligation to report bill
12-23. (1) The committee to which a bill has been referred shall report the bill to the Senate. The report shall set out any amendments that the committee is recommending. In addition, the report shall have appended to it the committee’s observations on:
(a) whether the bill generally conforms with the Constitution of Canada, including:
(i) the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and
(ii) the division of legislative powers between Parliament and the provincial and territorial legislatures;
(b) whether the bill conforms with treaties and international agreements that Canada has signed or ratified;
(c) whether the bill unduly impinges on any minority or economically disadvantaged groups;
(d) whether the bill has any impact on one or more provinces or territories;
(e) whether the appropriate consultations have been conducted;
(f) whether the bill contains any obvious drafting errors;
(g) all amendments moved but not adopted in the committee, including the text of these amendments; and
(h) any other matter that, in the committee’s opinion, should be brought to the attention of the Senate.”
And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Nancy Ruth, seconded by the Honourable Senator Tkachuk:
That the motion be not now adopted, but that it be amended by:
1.adding the following new subsection after proposed subsection (c):
“(d) whether the bill has received substantive gender-based analysis;”; and
2.by changing the designation for current proposed subsections (d) to (h) to (e) to (i).—(Honourable Senator Omidvar)
No. 92. (nine)
May 17, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ngo, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cowan:
That the Senate note with concern the escalating and hostile behaviour exhibited by the People’s Republic of China in the South China Sea and consequently urge the Government of Canada to encourage all parties involved, and in particular the People’s Republic of China, to:
(a) recognize and uphold the rights of freedom of navigation and overflight as enshrined in customary international law and in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea;
(b) cease all activities that would complicate or escalate the disputes, such as the construction of artificial islands, land reclamation, and further militarization of the region;
(c) abide by all previous multilateral efforts to resolve the disputes and commit to the successful implementation of a binding Code of Conduct in the South China Sea;
(d) commit to finding a peaceful and diplomatic solution to the disputes in line with the provisions of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and respect the settlements reached through international arbitration; and
(e) strengthen efforts to significantly reduce the environmental impacts of the disputes upon the fragile ecosystem of the South China Sea;
That the Senate also urge the Government of Canada to support its regional partners and allies and to take additional steps necessary to de-escalate tensions and restore the peace and stability of the region; and
That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint it with the foregoing.—(Honourable Senator McCoy)
No. 139. (twelve)
February 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C.:
That with Canada celebrating 150 years as a nation and acknowledging the lasting contribution of the First Nations, early settlers, and the continuing immigration of peoples from around the world who have made and continue to make Canada the great nation that it is, the Senate urge the Government to commit to establishing a National Portrait Gallery using the former US Embassy across from Parliament Hill as a lasting legacy to mark this important milestone in Canada’s history and in recognition of the people who contributed to its success.—(Honourable Senator Mercer)
No. 146. (ten)
December 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion, as amended, of the Honourable Senator Ringuette, seconded by the Honourable Senator Lankin, P.C.:
That the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade, and Commerce be authorized to:
(a)Review the operations of the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC), the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments (OBSI), and ADR Chambers Banking Ombuds Office (ADRBO);
(b)Review the agencies’ interaction with and respect for provincial jurisdictions;
(c)Review and determine best practices from similar agencies in other jurisdictions;
(d)Provide recommendations to ensure that the FCAC, OBSI, and ADRBO can better protect consumers and respect provincial jurisdiction; and
That the Committee submit its final report no later than March 18, 2018, and retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings until 180 days after the tabling of the final report.—(Honourable Senator Gold)
No. 158.
February 7, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Merchant, seconded by the Honourable Senator Housakos:
That the Senate call upon the government of Canada:
(a) to recognize the genocide of the Pontic Greeks of 1916 to 1923 and to condemn any attempt to deny or distort a historical truth as being anything less than genocide, a crime against humanity; and
(b) to designate May 19th of every year hereafter throughout Canada as a day of remembrance of the over 353,000 Pontic Greeks who were killed or expelled from their homes.—(Honourable Senator Marshall)
No. 189. (six)
May 8, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ringuette, seconded by the Honourable Senator McCoy:
That the Rules of the Senate be amended by:
1.replacing the period at the end of rule 12-7(16) by the following:
“; and
Human Resources
12-7. (17) the Standing Senate Committee on Human Resources, to which may be referred matters relating to human resources generally.”; and
2.updating all cross references in the Rules accordingly.—(Honourable Senator Gold)
No. 215. (three)
June 20, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Dawson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Munson:
That the Senate take note of Agenda 2030 and the related sustainable development goals adopted by the United Nations on September 25, 2015, and encourage the Government of Canada to take account of them as it drafts legislation and develops policy relating to sustainable development.
And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, seconded by the Honourable Senator Petitclerc:
That the motion be not now adopted, but that it be amended by:
1.adding the words “Parliament and” after the word “encourage”; and
2.replacing, in the English version, the words “it drafts legislation and develops” by the words “they draft legislation and develop”.—(Honourable Senator Plett)
No. 245. (six)
October 17, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Griffin, seconded by the Honourable Senator Martin:
That the Senate affirm that literacy is a core component to active citizenship, a determinant for healthy outcomes, and, at its core, key to building an innovative economy with good, sustainable jobs;
That the Senate urge the Government to take into consideration the particular regional circumstances of Atlantic Canada based on smaller populations, many of which are in rural areas, when determining whether to implement programs using project-based funding compared to core funding;
That the Senate further urge the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour to make an exception to the present terms and conditions of the Office of Literacy and Essential Skills project-based funding programs in order to request an emergency submission to the Treasury Board for $600,000 of core funding for the Atlantic Partnership for Literacy and Essential Skills based on their 2017 pre-budget consultation submission to Parliament; and
That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that house with the foregoing.—(Honourable Senator Mercer)
No. 286. (eight)
January 30, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Saint-Germain, seconded by the Honourable Senator Lankin, P.C.:
That, pursuant to chapter 4:01, section 2, of the Senate Administrative Rules, for the remainder of the current session, any senator who occupies more than one position of chair or deputy chair of a committee for which an additional allowance is payable be authorized to waive the portion of his or her allowance payable in respect of those additional positions of chair or deputy chair.—(Honourable Senator Andreychuk)
No. 292. (six)
February 1, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Patterson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Andreychuk:
That, without affecting the progress of any proceedings relating to Bill C-45, An Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other Acts, at 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday, February 7, 2018, the Senate resolve itself into a Committee of the Whole to consider the subject matter of the bill;
That the committee receive the Honourable Carolyn Bennett, P.C., M.P., Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs;
That the witness be accompanied by officials;
That the Committee of the Whole report to the Senate no later than two hours after it begins;
That television cameras and photographers be authorized in the Senate Chamber to broadcast and photograph the proceedings with the least possible disruption of the proceedings;
That the provisions of the order of February 4, 2016, respecting the time of adjournment, be suspended on Wednesday, February 7, 2018, until the Committee of the Whole has reported; and
That the provisions of rule 3-3(1) be suspended on Wednesday, February 7, 2018.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)
No. 302. (three)
February 15, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Pate, seconded by the Honourable Senator Marwah:
That the Senate administration be instructed to remove the website of the Honourable Senator Beyak from any Senate server and cease to support any website for the senator until the process undertaken by the Senate Ethics Officer following a request to conduct an inquiry under the Ethics and Conflict of Interest Code for Senators in relation to the content of Senator Beyak’s website and her obligations under the Code is finally disposed of, either by the tabling of the Senate Ethics Officer’s preliminary determination letter or inquiry report, by a report of the Standing Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest for Senators, or by a decision of the Senate respecting the matter.—(Honourable Senator Bovey)
No. 309.
March 1, 2018—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Dagenais, seconded by the Honourable Senator Oh:
That, given serious potential implications for Canada’s relations with India as well as for Canada’s national security arising out of the recent visit by the Prime Minister to that country, the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence be authorized to:
(a)Invite Mr. Daniel Jean, the Prime Minister’s National Security Advisor, to appear before the Committee to answer questions related to the issues arising from the recent visit by the Prime Minister to India;
(b)Invite additional witnesses from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, Global Affairs Canada and any other relevant agencies to explain how an individual convicted of serious criminal offences was permitted to attend official events involving the Prime Minister, Ministers and senior Canadian officials; and
(c)Provide any recommendations that the Committee believes may be warranted as a result of this incident;
That the Committee submit its final report no later than June 1, 2018, and retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings until 180 days after the tabling of the final report.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)
Inquiries
No. 8. (one)
May 5, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, calling the attention of the Senate to the Senate’s legislative work from the 24th to the 41st Parliament and on elements of evaluation.—(Honourable Senator Andreychuk)
No. 12. (one)
May 18, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Seidman, calling the attention of the Senate to its role in the protection of regional and minority representation.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 13. (one)
October 25, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, calling the attention of the Senate to the relevance of full employment in the 21st century in a Globalized economy.—(Honourable Senator Petitclerc)
No. 19. (four)
December 8, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Pate, calling the attention of the Senate to the circumstances of some of the most marginalized, victimized, criminalized and institutionalized in Canada, particularly the increasing over-representation of Indigenous women in Canadian prisons.—(Honourable Senator Sinclair)
No. 20. (four)
February 14, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Tardif, calling the attention of the Senate to regional universities and the important role they play in Canada.—(Honourable Senator Cordy)
No. 24. (four)
May 16, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Wallin, calling the attention of the Senate to the proposal put forward by Senator Harder, titled “Sober Second Thinking”, which reviews the Senate’s performance since the appointment of independent senators, and recommends the creation of a Senate business committee.—(Honourable Senator Cools)
No. 25. (five)
May 11, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Maltais, calling the attention of the Senate to the softwood lumber crisis.—(Honourable Senator Maltais)
No. 26. (four)
May 30, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator McPhedran, calling the attention of the Senate to the important opportunity we have to review our principles and procedures with a view to ensuring that the Senate has the strongest most effective policies and mechanisms possible to respond to complaints against senators of sexual or other kinds of harassment.—(Honourable Senator Galvez)
No. 28. (five)
June 21, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Bovey, calling the attention of the Senate to the crisis in Churchill, Manitoba.—(Honourable Senator Day)
No. 31. (fifteen)
October 3, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Munson, calling the attention of the Senate to the 10th anniversary of its groundbreaking report Pay Now or Pay Later: Autism Families in Crisis.—(Honourable Senator Martin)
No. 32. (nine)
December 12, 2017—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Wallin, calling the attention of the Senate to the federal government’s legal obligation to protect and maintain Canada’s voluntary blood system and to examine the issues surrounding commercial, cash- for- blood operations.—(Honourable Senator Omidvar)
No. 33. (four)
February 13, 2018—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Day, calling the attention of the Senate to the career of the Honourable Senator Fraser.—(Honourable Senator Cools)
No. 35. (four)
February 13, 2018—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Day, calling the attention of the Senate to the career of the Honourable Senator Tardif.—(Honourable Senator Cormier)
No. 36. (one)
February 27, 2018—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, calling the attention of the Senate to the challenges of literacy and essential skills for the 21st century in Canada, the provinces and the territories.—(Honourable Senator Gagné)
Other
Nil
Notice Paper
Motions
No. 298. (five)
By the Honourable Senator Neufeld:
February 8, 2018—That the Senate, whose members represent the various regions, provinces and territories of Canada, note with concern that people and businesses in British Columbia and Alberta are already beginning to suffer from the fall-out of an escalating inter-provincial trade dispute;
That the Senate urge the Prime Minister to bring the full weight and power of his office and that of the Government of Canada to ensure that the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion is completed on schedule; and
That the Senate also urge that the commitment of the Prime Minister and the Government to the goal of ensuring that the expansion is completed on time be officially conveyed to the governments of British Columbia and Alberta in a manner that leaves no doubt as to the federal government’s determination to see the project become fully operational within the present timeline.
No. 308.
By the Honourable Senator Andreychuk:
March 1, 2018—That, notwithstanding the order of the Senate adopted on Thursday, October 26, 2017, the date for the final report of the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade in relation to its study on the impact and utilization of Canadian culture and arts in Canadian foreign policy and diplomacy, and other related matters, be extended from March 31, 2018 to December 31, 2018.
No. 310.
By the Honourable Senator Doyle:
March 1, 2018—That the Senate encourage the Government of Canada to work with the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, the only province whose major population centres are not physically linked to the mainland of Canada, to evaluate the possibility of building a tunnel connecting the Island of Newfoundland to Labrador and the Quebec North Shore, in an effort to facilitate greater economic development in Canada’s Northeast, and to further strengthen national unity, including the possibility of using funding from the infrastructure program for this work; and
That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that house with the above.
Inquiries
No. 34. (six)
By the Honourable Senator Manning:
February 1, 2018—That he will call the attention of the Senate to the extraordinary life of Captain Augustine Dalton.
No. 37.
By the Honourable Senator Cools:
March 1, 2018—That she will call the attention of the Senate to the great nation-builders of Canada and its constituting statute, the British North America Act, 1867 and to this Act’s single comprehensive and conceptual framework expressed in section 91, in the words “It shall be lawful for the Queen to make Laws for the Peace, Order and good Government of Canada”; and, to General Wolfe’s 1759 conquest of Quebec, and to the October 7, 1763 Royal Proclamation, given by Britain’s King George III, which proclamation gave the Governors of the colonies, later called Ontario and Quebec, the power to summon and call General Assemblies in such manner and form as was used in said colonies under British rule.
No. 38.
By the Honourable Senator Cools:
March 1, 2018—That she will call the attention of the Senate to the great nation-builders of Canada and its constituting statute, the British North America Act, 1867 and to this Act’s single comprehensive and conceptual framework expressed in section 91, in the words “It shall be lawful for the Queen to make Laws for the Peace, Order and good Government of Canada;” and, to the British soldier-general Guy Carleton, later Lord Dorchester, the architect of the Quebec Act, 1774, which Act guaranteed the Roman Catholic religion, the French language and the French Napoleonic Civil Code to King George III’s French-speaking subjects in British North America.
No. 39.
By the Honourable Senator Bernard:
March 1, 2018—That she will call the attention of the Senate to anti-black racism.
Written Questions
No. 64.
By the Honourable Senator Griffin:
November 1, 2017—Further to my question to the Honourable Harjit Sajjan, Minister of National Defence in this chamber at Question Period on October 31, 2017 on national shipbuilding spending and ensuring equitable spending for each province, I ask the following:
1.What is the amount of money spent per province on national shipbuilding?
2.On a per capita basis, what is the amount of money spent per province on national shipbuilding?
No. 69.
By the Honourable Senator Smith:
January 30, 2018—Regarding a video titled “The Creation of the GRO in the Senate” (https://senate-gro.ca/senate-renewal/senate-gro-video/) :
1.Who was involved in producing the content of this video?
2.Who paid for it?
No. 70.
By the Honourable Senator Seidman:
February 6, 2018—With regard to the statement contained in Health Canada’s consultation document “Proposed Approach to the Regulation of Cannabis” that draft regulations will not be pre-published in order to meet the government’s commitment of bringing the proposed Cannabis Act into force no later than July 2018:
(a)On what grounds did Health Canada seek an exemption from Treasury Board from pre-publication?
(b)Did Treasury Board ministers grant Health Canada a written exemption from pre-publication?
(c)On what date did Treasury Board confirm in writing that it supports an exemption from pre-publication?
(d)What were the specific circumstances under which the proposed regulations were exempted from pre-publication by Treasury Board?
(e)What feedback (both informal and formal) has Health Canada received from stakeholders, including provinces and territories, with regard to its decision not to pre-publish regulations?
No. 71.
By the Honourable Senator Seidman:
February 6, 2018—With respect to the “ongoing digital campaign” to educate Canadians about the health impacts of cannabis referenced by a Health Canada spokesperson in the Hill Times on January 22, 2018 (“Government falling behind on cannabis public education, say critics”):
(a)What is the official name of the Health Canada campaign?
(b)What is the URL of the Health Canada campaign website?
(c)When did the Health Canada campaign officially launch?
(d) On which digital media sharing platforms (e.g. Facebook; Snapchat) is the Health Canada campaign currently active?
(e)What is Health Canada’s total spending to date on targeted online advertising in relation to the campaign?
(f)How many online impressions has the Health Canada campaign received to date?
(g)On what date is the Health Canada campaign projected to end?
No. 72.
By the Honourable Senator Seidman:
February 6, 2018—With respect to the packaging and labelling proposals described in Health Canada’s “Proposed Approach to the Regulation of Cannabis”:
Is it the position of Health Canada that the regulatory proposals relating to the appearance of packaging for cannabis products satisfy the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control guidelines for the packaging and labelling of tobacco products?
No. 73.
By the Honourable Senator Smith:
February 7, 2018—With respect to Bill C-45, An Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other Acts, “craft” licenses do not have the same security and safety requirements as the big licensed producers, particularly when it comes to outdoor grow operations. For example, the only security requirement for micro-growers will be a fence (no cameras, alarms, or detection systems).
This will create an opportunity for leakage from the legal market to the black market, and open the door for kids to get quick access to cannabis. This is opposite to the government’s objective of protecting youth and keeping cannabis out of the hands of criminals.
1. How do(es) the Minister(s) justify removing all security requirements for micro outdoor grow?
2. What are the implications of this with respect to diversion to the black market?
3.How do(es) the Minister(s) propose to prevent theft of cannabis from farms when their only security requirement is a fence?
4.What analysis has taken place related to a size limitation for outdoor growing?
(a)Please outline the discussions that have taken place; and
(b)Describe the consultations that have taken place with stakeholders and which stakeholders have been engaged.
No. 74.
By the Honourable Senator Smith:
February 7, 2018—With respect to an interview given by the Minister of Public Safety, the Hon. Ralph Goodale, to the CBC in September 2016 regarding the treatment of Canadian citizens who admit prior recreational marijuana use while attempting to cross the shared border with the United States (http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ludicrous-pot-border-goodale-1.3754315):
1.Since September 2016, how many times has the Minister discussed the treatment at the border of Canadians who admit prior recreational marijuana use with his counterpart at the United States Department of Homeland Security? Please provide details of these discussions, including:
(a)dates;
(b)locations;
(c)attendees; and
(d)briefing notes or other documents prepared for the Minister.
2.Since September 2016, how many times have the Minister’s officials discussed the treatment at the border of Canadians who admit prior recreational marijuana use with their counterparts at the United States Department of Homeland Security? Please provide details of these discussions, including:
(a)dates;
(b)locations;
(c)attendees; and
(d)briefing notes or other documents prepared.
3.Has the United States Department of Homeland Security provided any information to the Minister or his officials regarding the policy that American officials will follow related to the screening and admissibility to the United States of Canadian citizens who admit prior recreational marijuana use? If affirmative, please summarize the changes and provide the date(s) when this information was communicated to the Minister of Public Safety and/or his officials.
4.Since September 2016, what specific measures has the Government of Canada taken to ensure that travel across the Canada-US border will not be subject to additional delays after the coming into force of Bill C-45?
No. 75.
By the Honourable Senator Smith:
February 7, 2018—The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation states: “Employer groups called for more guidance from federal, provincial and territorial governments about appropriate workplace drug use and drug testing policies.”
The United States of America Department of Transportation’s drug testing regulation 49 CFR Part 40 has set standards that require random testing of employees in roles of transport and public safety with zero tolerance for marijuana.
1. What is the current status of the Government of Canada’s consultation process with provinces, territories and stakeholders to create a framework that will address substance abuse at work?
(a)Please outline the discussions that have taken place; and
(b)Please describe the consultations that have taken place with stakeholders and which stakeholders have been engaged.
2. Has Transport Canada developed a framework for public safety to comply with the United States standards of mandatory random drug testing?
No. 76.
By the Honourable Senator Smith:
February 7, 2018—At the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs meeting February 1, 2018, RCMP Acting Commissioner Kevin Brosseau stated that “given the involvement of organized crime in the illicit cannabis market, we do not expect that the legislation will eliminate organized crime’s presence in the cannabis market”.
Further, Minister of Health Ginette Petitpas Taylor said the illegal market for cannabis will not disappear with the flick of a switch, but that everyone should work together to better protect young Canadians and remove criminal elements from the production chain. “The system is not going to be perfect in July, 2018,” she said. “With respect to the black market, we certainly want to make a dent in it. Do we think it will happen overnight? Absolutely not.” (https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/federal-government-targets-black-and-grey-markets-with-legal-cannabis/article37471020/).
1. Can the Government please share any evidence and policing assessments that it possesses to support its assertion that Bill C-45 will eliminate the black market on marijuana? Please provide information on the process that has been followed to make such assessments and outline the research work that has been undertaken and shared through briefing notes for the Ministers of Public Safety, Justice and Health.
2.On what basis is the Government asserting that this legislation will eliminate the black market when RCMP officers have consistently stated that this legislation will not eliminate the black market?
3. Please provide all internal assessments from the Department of Health which inform Minister Petitpas Taylor’s assertion that this legislation will make a “measurable dent” on the black market. What is the anticipated timeline for reducing and ultimately eliminating the black market?
4.There are a plethora of products that will remain illegal following the adoption of this legislation; for instance, marijuana infused creams and other marijuana infused products. Can the Government share RCMP assessments on the impact that parallel illegal products will have in sustaining the black market and the accompanying rationale for legalizing marijuana while keeping parallel products illegal?
No. 77.
By the Honourable Senator Oh:
February 8, 2018—The federal government introduced Bill C-45, An Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other Acts to legalize, regulate and restrict cannabis in Canada. One of the key policy objectives of this legislation is to protect children and youth. However, various stakeholders have expressed concern that gaps in a number of areas may lead to unintended consequences for this sector of our population. The Canadian Council of Child and Youth Advocates, which is a national organization of provincial and territorial child and youth advocates, argued last month that the legislation “fails to adequately focus on, or protect, children from the potential harms of legalized cannabis.” (www.newswire.ca/news-releases/canadian-council-of-child-and-youth-advocates-issue-statement-on-bill-c-45-the-cannabis-act-671745473.html) Two months earlier, the Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children, which consists of more than fifty non-governmental organizations, called on the federal government to conduct a thorough Child Rights Impact Assessment of the legislation. (http://rightsofchildren.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Marijuana-Use-and-Young-People-Open-Letter-by-CCRC1.pdf) Such systematic assessment would help ensure that Canada fulfills its obligation, as a duty bearer under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, to respect, protect and fulfill the rights of all children and youth. It would also help identify areas where additional safeguards or education may be necessary to mitigate the potential to normalize the use of recreational cannabis, and to stimulate demand and associated harms among vulnerable youth.
•Could the federal government please confirm that Bill C-45 complies with Canada’s obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child? Was a thorough Child Rights Impact Assessment conducted before tabling this legislation? If so, when will the results and recommendations from this assessment be made public?
No. 78.
By the Honourable Senator Downe:
February 8, 2018—Regarding the Canada Child Benefit, for the 2016-17 fiscal year:
1.How much money was provided via the Canada Child Benefit per federal electoral district in Prince Edward Island?
2.What was the average monthly payment for those Prince Edward Islanders receiving the Canada Child Benefit?
3.What percentage of recipients in Prince Edward Island had adjusted net family annual income:
(a)under $30,000;
(b)between $30,000 and $49,999;
(c)between $50,000 and $79,999; and
(d)over $80,000.
4.What was the average adjusted net family income for those Prince Edward Islanders receiving the Canada Child Benefit?
No. 79.
By the Honourable Senator McIntyre:
February 14, 2018—With respect to Canada’s international treaty obligations relating to marijuana:
Canada is a signatory to three United Nations drug control conventions: the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs; the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances; and the 1988 United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
Assuming Bill C-45, An Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other Acts becomes law, Canada will violate the United Nations drug control conventions that it is legally obliged to follow.
1.Has the Government of Canada determined how it will reconcile its international obligations under these drug control treaties with the legalization of marijuana? If so, will the Government of Canada propose amendments to the terms of these conventions, or will the Government of Canada withdraw from these conventions?
2.If a decision has been taken to withdraw from the conventions, has the Government of Canada provided advance notice of its intention to withdraw from the three conventions under Article 46 of the International Drug Control Conventions, and if so, on what date?
3.If no decision has been taken, when does the Government of Canada intend to announce its intentions regarding these conventions?
No. 80.
By the Honourable Senator Boisvenu:
February 27, 2018—Regarding Health Canada:
For each of these licensed producers that have benefited from investments coming from the following countries, what is the name of each specific personal and/or corporate investor:
ABCANN GLOBAL
Cayman Islands: $12.4 million
Guernsey: $150,000
AURORA CANNABIS
Cayman Islands: $32.5 million
Barbados: $202,500
CANNTRUST HOLDINGS
Cayman Islands: $2 million
Bahamas: $549,000
Switzerland: $110,000
Belize: $50,000
Channel Islands: $75,000
SUPREME CANNABIS CORPORATION
Switzerland: $100,000
Belize: $100,000
Bahamas: $130,000
Cayman Islands: $10.5 million
Guernsey: $366,000
United Arab Emirates: $25,000
CANNABIS WHEATON INCOME CORP
Singapore: $10,000
Cayman Islands: $20.5 million
Switzerland: $20,000
HYDROPOTHECARY
Cayman Islands: $15 million
United Arab Emirates: $700,000
Bahamas: $751,500
DELSHEN THERAPEUTICS (48 North)
British Virgin Islands: $3 million
Switzerland: $200,000
CRONOS GROUP
Singapore: $225,000
NEWSTRIKE RESOURCES
Bahamas: $47,500
Singapore: $70,000
Switzerland: $24,400
EMBLEM CANNABIS CORP
Panama: $200,000
Switzerland: $188,650
Bahamas: $308,550
Cayman Islands: $8.3 million
Dominica: $47,190
Belize: $40,250
British Virgin Islands: $21,275
Isle of Man: $57,500
Luxembourg: $69,000
GOLDEN LEAF HOLDINGS
Bahamas: $308,000
Cayman Islands: $5.7 million
INVICTUS MD
Seychelles: $765,000
Cayman Islands: $14.13 million
Switzerland: $27,000
Luxembourg: $78,750
United Arab Emirates: $10,500
MARICANN GROUP
Cayman Islands: $9.76 million
Bahamas: $50,000
THE GREEN ORGANIC DUTCHMAN
Singapore: $9,900
Hong Kong: $47,850
Barbados: $99,825
Bermuda: $115,500
Cayman Islands: $553,000
Monaco: $34,980
United Arab Emirates: $24,750
Dominica: $123,750
Luxembourg: $23,098
Switzerland: $50,000
Curacao: $11,500
Aruba: $5,750
Panama: $80,500
Malta: $10,000
British Virgin Islands: $10,000
Belize: $75,000
Marshall Islands: $10,000
HARVEST ONE CANNABIS
Cayman Islands: $4.37 million
Luxembourg: $600,000
Belize: $99,750
Bahamas: $225,000
Hong Kong: $499,999
WEEDMD
Cayman Islands: $2.28 million
Bahamas: $25,000
DELTA 9 BIOTECH
Belize: $22,000
Cayman Islands: $25,000
Singapore: $300,000
DOJA CANNABIS
Cayman Islands: $12.5 million
Bahamas: $70,000
INDIVA LIMITED
Cayman Islands: $199,500
FV PHARMA
Panama: $50,000
Malta: $50,000
Hong Kong: $2 million
Belize: $50,000
Bahamas: $10,000
SUNDIAL GROWERS
Bermuda: $540,000
No. 81.
By the Honourable Senator Oh:
March 1, 2018—With regards to applications for Canadian citizenship submitted by persons under the age of 18 before and after Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act received Royal Assent on June 19, 2017:
1. How many applications were submitted under subsection 5(3) or 5(4) of the Citizenship Act by persons younger than 18 years of age before June 19, 2017 to request a waiver on compassionate grounds? How many of such applications have been processed and have yet to be processed by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada? Could you please include data about the age, gender, and province of residence of applicants? Could you also please specify the date of application and the effective date of citizenship?
2. Is it the official position of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada that persons younger than 18 years of age who submitted an application under subsection 5(3) or 5(4) of the Citizenship Act before June 19, 2017 and are now eligible to apply under subsection 5(1), will have to re-apply in order to obtain Canadian citizenship? Will such applications be given special consideration and/or be processed urgently? What will be the average processing time for such applications?
3. How many applications have been submitted by persons younger than 18 years of age under subsection 5(1) of the Citizenship Act since June 19, 2017? How many of such applications have been processed and have yet to be processed? Could you please include data about the age, gender, and province of residence of applicants? Could you also please specify the date of application and the effective date of citizenship?